Last year in my professional
communications in biology course, we were assigned to write a literature review
on any topic related to science. Finding a topic was not too difficult, but
understanding the topic was a challenge. The field of science I chose to
research was nanotechnology and its applications to medicine.
As Kuhlthau describes in her article,
I definitely experienced a “dip” in confidence during the exploration portion
of my information seeking process. This happened when I began searching “nanotechnology”
and “nanoparticles” into databases from WSUV and finding all sorts of studies
examining the structures and uses of nanoparticles in specific illness
treatments. Because the peer reviewed papers were so dense and filled with
advanced scientific terms, I felt very confused and lost. The more studies I
viewed the more uncertain I felt about my topic and the gap in my lack of
understanding grew.
In terms of the principle of
uncertainty, I felt I was in the redundancy corollary. I was bombarded with too
much unique information and not enough redundancy in my early stages of
research, which led to frustration and anxiety about my assignment.
The way I was able to move into the
stage of formulation and beyond, was due to the
zone of intervention. I needed advice and assistance, both from my instructor
and from online resources. My instructor gave me contact information about a student
in a previous year who had researched nanotechnology. I got in contact with him
and he shared some useful links and videos with me that helped me grasp the
fundamentals of the topic. I would not have been able to understand
nanotechnology on my own had it not been from the aid I got from my fellow
peers, my instructor, and websites like YouTube.
I thought this article was very interesting
in that it incorporated and analyzed the emotional aspect in the research process.
I have always had anxious feelings whenever assigned to write long papers
because I would worry about not finding enough useful and easy-to-read sources.
It makes me feel better that what I was experiencing was not an unusual thing.
Many people feel frustration and uncertainty in the early research timeline. In
the future, I will know not to stress out too much if I do not know which topic
I want to research or if I do not understand my topic because there are plenty
of resources available for me to help me progress and accomplish my task.
Hi Danny, that sounds like a very interesting research experience. That's great that you were able to get such helpful tips from a student who had researched the same topic, and that your instructor supported this. Your story illustrates the importance of exploration and background research so that there will be an adequate amount of "redundancy" (that is, familiar information or context) when you dive into the journal articles. I'm glad you found the Kuhlthau article interesting.--Sam
ReplyDelete